Appeals to the body: since everyone has a body and is
affected by similar issues associated with the body such as hunger and sex
drive, advertisers frequently target body-focused messages in order to reach
the maximum amount of potential customers.
In a similar manner, rhetoricians can use the same technique to guide
others into adopting a new point of view.
For example, an author or speaker can describe nature or politics in
terms of a human body with head, hands, stomach, etc. In addition, bodies can also be dehumanized
when it comes to enemies or emphasized when it comes to physical
disabilities. And finally, with the rise
of technology, the lines between body and technology blur even further with each
technological advancement.
Appeals to gender: careful attention should be made when
stereotyping gender as well as sexuality.
In addition, rhetoricians should be conscious of the power dynamic such
as differences in political power between the sexes. Also, the rhetorician should beware that the
line between exploitation and empowerment can be blurred and that both
phenomena can even occur simultaneously.
And finally, authors should never identify one gender in terms of the
opposite gender.
Appeals to race: rhetoricians should beware of “othering”
people of other races or backgrounds.
This phenomenon is related to dehumanizing or demonizing, and it favors
one group of people over another.
Professors should also remember that becoming a successful academic does
not necessarily mean that the student should shed their familial, communal, or
cultural background. It is important
that all races have an equal opportunity to learn, and an important factor between
the powerful and the powerless is education.
Appeals through tropes: rhetoricians can make appeals
through tropes such as metaphor, metonymy, synecdoche, and irony. Basically, the four tropes can be broken down
into the following categories: identity, association, representation, and reversal
of expectations respectively. An
interesting book to check out would be George Lakoff and Mark Johnson’s book Metaphors We Live By which details how
the human experience is founded on our ability to create and understand
metaphors.
The appeal of narrative: narratives can take the form of
illustrations, examples, and anecdotes; they are in contrast to data or
statistical forms of evidence. Whereas
data-based evidence is usually the pre-dominant form of evidence in specialized
fields, the narrative structure is the pre-dominant form to communicate
concepts to those outside the field.
This is because people outside of the Discourse community may not be
familiar with the history, logic, or technical jargon of the specialized
field. Thus, narratives require
storytellers to have a sense of audience awareness to judge what each audience
needs to hear. Storytelling has three
purposes: to build a community, reinforce values, and to teach life
lessons. Narratives are also more
democratic than data because everyone can listen to a story and anyone can be a
storyteller. If someone has experienced
a unique situation or been a part of a unique community, then that person has
the authority to tell a story on that subject; that person can instruct others
and allow others to change their perspectives through vicarious
experience. Thus, narratives should show
rather than tell.
Commentary: personally, I have a fascination with the
narrative form. As a kid, I would always
look forward to the telling of a good bed-time story. In reference to the chapter on appeals to the
body, there are channels that cater to specific groups. For instance, SpikeTV for men, ESPN for
sports fans, Oxygen for women, and Speed for racing fans are all channels that
cater to a specific demographic. I
notice that the more specific the audience, the more data is used. For example, a World Series of Poker
broadcast would have multiple statistics on the screen simultaneously. Football analysis on ESPN usually includes
multiple sets of data such as completion percentage, passer rating, total
yards, etc. On the other hand, the same
story meant for a wider audience such as a nightly newscast would leave out
most of the statistics and focus on the narrative such as “team X rallied from
behind in order to overcome team Y in the final quarter.” Even on SpikeTV where their most famous shows
are Cops and 1001 Ways to Die, both shows deliver a narrative followed by a set
of data. In Cops, after the narrative of
the police arresting the perpetrator, the police officer explains the law
broken and the punishment for the offender; in 1001 Ways to Die, after the
narrative of how a person died, the show’s narrator explains the science behind
each death. On the other hand, the most
frequent use of data-based evidence on a newscast comes from surveys and eye-witness
accounts, lesser reliable forms of data.
Thus, the more specific the audience, the more data should be
incorporated into the message. This is
an important lesson for rhetoricians and falls under the umbrella of audience
awareness: general population should focus on narratives while specific groups
should focus on data. However, this contrasts
with the techniques in Killingsworth’s final chapter where he claims that
narrative works better for an audience of adolescents than data. In addition, the specific audience of the
ancient tribesmen would favor more of a narrative structure than a data-driven
one. So, even though the audience may be
specific, the rhetorician should use his or her best judgment to determine
whether to focus on narrative or data-based arguments.
No comments:
Post a Comment